“Artificial intelligence will replace many human jobs in the coming decades. Is this a positive or negative development?”
by Anonymous · graded by ieltsprep AI
Published May 27, 2026 · 269 words
P1The prospect of artificial intelligence assuming roles currently performed by people is often viewed with alarm. While the displacement of certain workers is a legitimate concern, I believe this shift is, on balance, a positive development, provided that societies manage the transition responsibly.
P2Admittedly, the automation of human labour carries real risks. Jobs built around routine, predictable tasks such as data entry, assembly-line production and basic customer service are the most vulnerable, and the people who hold them are frequently those with the fewest alternatives. If governments and employers fail to retrain these workers, the result could be widening inequality and social resentment, as has arguably occurred in regions where manufacturing collapsed without replacement industries.
P3Nevertheless, the broader consequences of intelligent automation are likely to be beneficial. Throughout history, technologies that eliminated arduous or repetitive work have ultimately created new categories of employment that were previously unimaginable. The spread of computers, for instance, destroyed some clerical roles while generating entire industries in software and digital services. Artificial intelligence promises a similar reshaping, freeing people from monotonous duties so they can pursue more creative, analytical and interpersonal work that machines cannot easily replicate. Medicine offers a clear illustration: when algorithms take over diagnostic screening, doctors gain time to focus on judgement and patient care.
P4In conclusion, although the rise of artificial intelligence will inevitably eliminate many existing jobs and demands careful policy to protect those affected, its capacity to raise human potential and create new opportunities makes it a fundamentally positive force. The challenge for governments is not to resist the technology but to ensure its rewards are shared widely.
What works
- ✓Task Response (8.0): You address all parts of the task with a clear, well-developed position throughout. Your essay acknowledges the risks of AI-driven job loss but argues convincingly for the overall positive impact, supporting your points with relevant examples like the history of technological change and the specific case of medicine. The discussion is balanced and nuanced, though the development of the counter-argument could be slightly more extended. Overall, your ideas are relevant, extended, and well supported, matching the Band 8 descriptor.
- ✓Coherence & Cohesion (8.0): Your essay is logically organised, with clear progression from introduction to conclusion. Paragraphing is appropriate and each paragraph has a clear central topic. Cohesive devices are used naturally and effectively, such as 'Admittedly', 'Nevertheless', and 'In conclusion', without mechanical repetition. Reference and substitution are handled well, and transitions between ideas are smooth. The essay reads fluently and is easy to follow, consistent with Band 8.
What holds it back
- ×Task Response (8.0): You address all parts of the task with a clear, well-developed position throughout. Your essay acknowledges the risks of AI-driven job loss but argues convincingly for the overall positive impact, supporting your points with relevant examples like the history of technological change and the specific case of medicine. The discussion is balanced and nuanced, though the development of the counter-argument could be slightly more extended. Overall, your ideas are relevant, extended, and well supported, matching the Band 8 descriptor.
- ×Coherence & Cohesion (8.0): Your essay is logically organised, with clear progression from introduction to conclusion. Paragraphing is appropriate and each paragraph has a clear central topic. Cohesive devices are used naturally and effectively, such as 'Admittedly', 'Nevertheless', and 'In conclusion', without mechanical repetition. Reference and substitution are handled well, and transitions between ideas are smooth. The essay reads fluently and is easy to follow, consistent with Band 8.
- ×The rewrite adds a concrete example (the American Midwest) to clarify and strengthen the counter-argument, making the risks of automation more vivid and specific. This enhances both task response and coherence.
Admittedly, the automation of human labour carries real risks. Jobs built around routine, predictable tasks such as data entry, assembly-line production, and basic customer service are the most vulnerable, and the people who hold them are frequently those with the fewest alternatives. For example, in parts of the American Midwest, the collapse of manufacturing without replacement industries led to significant unemployment and social challenges. If governments and employers fail to retrain these workers, the result could be widening inequality and social resentment.
The rewrite adds a concrete example (the American Midwest) to clarify and strengthen the counter-argument, making the risks of automation more vivid and specific. This enhances both task response and coherence.
Write yours. Get it graded in 60s.
Same four examiner criteria. Sentence-level highlights. We tell you the exact word that cost you the band, no hand-waving.
Grade my essay