Band 8 model answer
A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.
“Today's young workers change careers more often than previous generations. What are the causes, and is this a positive or negative trend?”8
Overall
8
Task response
8
Coherence & cohesion
8
Lexical resource
8
Grammar
The career trajectory of today's young workers differs markedly from that of their parents' generation, with multiple employer changes or even wholesale profession shifts now common within the first decade of professional life. Understanding the causes of this shift and evaluating its broader significance are both important tasks.
Several forces have loosened the attachment to a single employer or profession. The decline of long-term job security is significant: in many sectors, permanent contracts have been replaced by fixed-term arrangements, gig-economy platforms or project-based work, making loyalty to one organisation economically irrational when that loyalty is not reciprocated. Young workers have also grown up observing rapid technological change render certain professions obsolete and create new ones within a single decade, leading to a pragmatic understanding that adaptability is a more durable asset than specialisation. Social norms around career identity have shifted correspondingly: whereas previous generations often viewed a career change as a personal failure or social embarrassment, it is now widely regarded as evidence of ambition and self-knowledge.
Whether this trend is positive or negative depends on the level of analysis. For individuals, the freedom to change direction can lead to greater job satisfaction, broader skill sets and ultimately more fulfilling professional lives. Labour markets benefit from workers who are flexible and willing to acquire new competencies as economic demands evolve.
However, frequent transitions impose real costs. Employers struggle to justify investment in training and development when staff retention is unpredictable. Pension systems built around long-term contribution records disadvantage those with fragmented careers. For some individuals, instability generates chronic financial anxiety that outweighs the benefits of variety.
On balance, the trend is mildly positive for individuals and the economy, provided that social infrastructure, portable benefits, retraining support and flexible pension arrangements, evolves to accommodate it.
- •Identifies three causes, structural job insecurity, technological change and shifting norms, each developed with its own logic.
- •The individual versus systemic levels of analysis are clearly distinguished, adding sophistication.
- •The conclusion qualifies its positive judgement with an important policy condition rather than offering false optimism.
- •The employer-training-investment point is the most underdeveloped argument in the negative case and could be expanded slightly.
Write your own. Get a real band read.
Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.
Attempt this question