Band 8 model answer
A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.
“Some say travel is more rewarding when you are young, while others believe older people benefit more. Discuss both views.”8
Overall
8
Task response
8
Coherence & cohesion
8
Lexical resource
8
Grammar
Travel is widely regarded as one of life's most enriching experiences, yet there is genuine disagreement about when its benefits are most keenly felt. Some hold that youth is the ideal time to explore the world, while others contend that maturity allows for a deeper appreciation of what one encounters. Both perspectives have real substance.
Those who favour travelling young emphasise physical resilience and openness to novelty. A twenty-year-old can trek for hours, sleep in basic accommodation, navigate chaotic transport systems and recover from setbacks with an ease that diminishes with age. Beyond the practical, younger travellers tend to arrive without the weight of fixed assumptions, making them more receptive to genuinely foreign ways of life. A gap year spent across South-East Asia, for instance, can challenge cultural prejudices at a stage when the personality is still being formed, leaving impressions that endure for decades.
Those who argue in favour of travel later in life point to the richness of interpretive context that experience provides. An older person visiting historical sites in Athens or Kyoto brings knowledge of ancient civilisations, political history and philosophy that transforms a monument from a picturesque curiosity into a layered human document. Retirement also removes the constraint of limited annual leave, permitting slow, unhurried immersion rather than compressed highlights in a fortnight.
I find the case for mature travel intellectually compelling but think youth ultimately has the edge, principally because the shifts in perspective travel provokes matter most when the mind is still most plastic. Understanding absorbed at twenty shapes a person's trajectory in ways that equivalent insight at sixty, however meaningful, cannot match.
In conclusion, both stages of life offer distinct and genuine rewards from travel, but the transformative potential of encountering difference is greatest when the traveller is young and still actively constructing their worldview.
- •Both views are genuinely developed with distinct, well-chosen rationales rather than mirror-image arguments.
- •Specific illustrative contexts, South-East Asia gap year, Athens or Kyoto monuments, make the abstract tangible.
- •The opinion paragraph introduces a 'plasticity' argument not simply repeated from the body, showing independent reasoning.
- •The phrase 'intellectually compelling but' is slightly formulaic and could be replaced with a more original transition.
Write your own. Get a real band read.
Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.
Attempt this question