📝 Model answerBand 8.5301 words

Band 8.5 model answer

A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8.5 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.

Modern life is destroying traditional cultures. To what extent do you agree?

8.5

Overall

8

Task response

8.5

Coherence & cohesion

8.5

Lexical resource

8

Grammar

Globalisation, digital connectivity and rapid economic development have undeniably altered the way billions of people live, and there is a widely held view that traditional cultures are being eroded as a result. I largely agree with this position, though I would argue the process is more complex than simple destruction.

The pressures on traditional cultures are real and well documented. As satellite television, social media and international brands penetrate even remote communities, younger generations increasingly adopt the languages, fashions and values they see broadcast from wealthier nations. In many parts of West Africa and South-East Asia, for instance, local festivals and craft traditions are being abandoned by young people who regard them as signs of backwardness rather than heritage. Economic migration compounds this: when rural populations move to cities in search of work, the tightly knit social structures that sustained oral traditions, religious ceremonies and communal practices are often dispersed beyond recovery.

Yet the picture is not entirely bleak. In some countries, modernity has actually given traditional cultures wider reach and longevity. Digital recording technology preserves endangered languages and folk music that would otherwise vanish with their last speakers, while tourism generates the income communities need to maintain historical sites and crafts. Ireland's revival of the Irish language and New Zealand's Maori renaissance demonstrate that determined collective effort, supported by modern communication tools, can sustain and even reinvigorate traditions.

The crucial variable is agency. When communities choose how to engage with the modern world, traditions tend to adapt and survive; when change is imposed through colonialism, forced assimilation or economic desperation, it tends to erase them.

In conclusion, I agree that modern life poses a serious threat to traditional cultures, but the threat is not inevitable, deliberate policy and community choice can preserve much of what would otherwise be lost.

✅ What carries it
  • Takes a nuanced, qualified position that addresses the complexity of the topic without losing a clear overall stance.
  • Develops both the threat and the counter-evidence with specific regional examples (West Africa, Ireland, New Zealand Maori).
  • Introduces an analytical pivot, agency, that elevates the argument beyond a simple for/against structure.
  • Precise collocations: 'tightly knit social structures', 'oral traditions', 'economic desperation'.
⚠️ What keeps it from higher
  • The conclusion slightly repeats the introduction; a final forward-looking sentence would add more closure.
⚡ Your turn

Write your own. Get a real band read.

Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.

Attempt this question