283 words, written by us as a teaching example — not a verified exam script. Read it, then attempt the question yourself.
“Some argue tourists should be required to learn about local customs before visiting a country. To what extent …”Model answer
283 wordsP1The suggestion that tourists should be required to learn about local customs before visiting another country has a reasonable ethical basis, but I disagree with making such learning a formal requirement. Encouraging cultural awareness is admirable; mandating and enforcing it raises practical and philosophical difficulties that outweigh its potential benefits.
P2The underlying concern is legitimate. Mass tourism can generate genuine harm when visitors, through ignorance or indifference, violate the cultural or religious norms of host communities. Tourists photographing sacred ceremonies without consent, dressing inappropriately at religious sites, or engaging in behaviour considered deeply disrespectful in local contexts cause real offence and, over time, erode the social fabric of communities that depend on tourism economically but resent its cultural footprint.
P3Voluntary education initiatives, information packs at visa issuance, digital guides distributed by airlines and booking platforms, prominently placed guidance at major attractions, can meaningfully raise awareness without the coercive dimensions of a formal requirement. Many visitors will respond positively to information that is presented respectfully and accessibly, and the nudge architecture of modern travel booking makes it straightforward to surface such content at the point of planning.
Write your answer in the exam workspace and see how your four marks compare to the model’s.
P4A mandatory requirement, however, poses insuperable practical challenges. How would competence in cultural knowledge be assessed, standardised, and enforced across millions of travellers annually, arriving from hundreds of different countries? Any plausible enforcement mechanism would be either prohibitively bureaucratic or effectively unenforceable, rendering the policy largely symbolic. There is also a principled concern about freedom of movement and the paternalism of requiring demonstrable knowledge as a condition of international travel.
P5Promoting cultural sensitivity through education and good information design is entirely appropriate. Transforming that aspiration into a gatekeeping requirement, however, is neither practical nor proportionate.