255 words, written by us as a teaching example — not a verified exam script. Read it, then attempt the question yourself.
“Social media has changed the way people debate politics. Are the effects mainly positive or negative?”Model answer
255 wordsP1Social media has transformed the way ordinary people discuss and debate political issues. While these platforms have undeniably widened participation, I believe their overall effect on political debate has been more negative than positive.
P2It would be unfair to ignore the benefits. Social media has given a voice to millions who were previously excluded from political conversation, allowing citizens to organise, share information instantly, and hold those in power to account. Movements that might once have struggled for attention can now mobilise supporters across the world within hours, which represents a genuine democratisation of public debate.
P3Despite these gains, the drawbacks are more serious. The structure of these platforms tends to reward emotion and conflict rather than reasoned argument, so nuanced discussion is frequently drowned out by insults and slogans. Algorithms that show users only content they already agree with create "echo chambers" in which people are rarely exposed to opposing views, hardening opinions and deepening division. Worse still, the speed and anonymity of online debate allow misinformation and personal abuse to flourish, discouraging moderate voices from taking part at all.
Write your answer in the exam workspace and see how your four marks compare to the model’s.
P4On balance, although social media has made politics more accessible, it has also made political conversation more hostile, polarised, and prone to manipulation. The quality of debate, in my view, matters more than its sheer quantity, and on this measure the platforms have done considerable harm.
P5In conclusion, while social media has broadened political engagement, its tendency to amplify hostility and misinformation means that, overall, its influence on political debate has been predominantly negative.