Band 8 model answer
A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.
“Some argue major decisions should be made by referendum rather than by elected officials. To what extent do you agree?”8
Overall
8
Task response
8
Coherence & cohesion
8
Lexical resource
8
Grammar
The idea that major national decisions should be settled by referendum rather than by elected representatives has intuitive democratic appeal. I partially agree: referendums can be a valuable supplement to representative government on genuinely foundational constitutional questions, but they are poorly suited to the majority of complex policy decisions.
Where referendums work well is in resolving questions of deep constitutional or sovereignty significance, where the legitimacy of any outcome depends on direct popular consent. The choice of whether a country joins a monetary union, alters its constitution, or changes its electoral system involves long-term consequences that citizens arguably have the right to ratify themselves. In such cases, a referendum provides a mandate that even the most contentious parliamentary vote cannot fully replicate.
However, extending this principle to ordinary policy-making is problematic. Effective governance routinely requires weighing intricate evidence across healthcare, economic modelling, environmental science, and international law. Elected officials, supported by specialist civil servants and parliamentary committees, are institutionally equipped to deliberate on such trade-offs. Voters, who have limited time and access to full technical briefings, are not. The Brexit referendum illustrated how a highly complex set of trade and governance arrangements was reduced to a binary choice, with consequences that took years to disentangle.
There is also the risk of the tyranny of the majority. Representative systems include checks and balances, judicial review, committee scrutiny, minority protections, that a straight majority vote bypasses. Minority rights in particular are vulnerable when questions are settled by plebiscite without such safeguards.
In summary, referendums are legitimate and powerful on constitutional fundamentals, but delegating routine major decisions to them undermines the expertise and accountability structures that make democratic governance functional.
- •Sophisticated partial-agreement position avoids a simplistic binary and is well-sustained
- •Brexit example is used analytically rather than politically, illustrating complexity reduction
- •Tyranny-of-the-majority point demonstrates awareness of democratic theory beyond surface-level argument
- •Each paragraph has a clear controlling idea and follows logically from the last
- •The opening paragraph's concession could be more precise about which constitutional categories qualify
Write your own. Get a real band read.
Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.
Attempt this question