Band 8 model answer
A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.
“In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?”8
Overall
8
Task response
8
Coherence & cohesion
8
Lexical resource
8
Grammar
In a number of countries, homeownership is regarded as not merely a practical arrangement but a marker of personal achievement and social stability. Understanding why this cultural value has developed, and assessing whether it is ultimately beneficial, raises important questions about housing policy and individual wellbeing.
The reasons for prizing homeownership are deeply embedded in both economic and psychological logic. A property serves as a long-term investment that accumulates value over time, providing financial security in old age for households that would otherwise rely entirely on pension income. In rental markets where tenancy agreements can be terminated by landlords with relatively short notice, ownership provides security of tenure that renters lack, a particularly salient concern for families with children in local schools or elderly relatives requiring stability. At a cultural level, homeownership has been actively promoted by governments through tax incentives and subsidised mortgage schemes, reinforcing the perception that renting is a transitional and inferior state rather than a valid long-term choice.
Whether this situation is positive or negative is a matter of perspective. From the homeowner's viewpoint, ownership delivers financial and psychological benefits that are real and well documented. Societies with high rates of homeownership also tend to have stronger community ties, as invested owners are more likely to maintain properties and engage with neighbourhood institutions.
Nevertheless, the cultural imperative to own can produce serious social distortions. It inflates demand for purchase in ways that push prices beyond the reach of younger and lower-income households, creating intergenerational inequality in asset accumulation. It also reduces labour mobility, as homeowners are less willing to relocate for employment than renters, which can reduce economic dynamism. On balance, the situation is negative when cultural pressure to own displaces rational housing choices and entrenches inequality.
- •Answers both parts of the question, the reasons and the evaluative judgement, with equal rigour.
- •Identifies the role of government policy in constructing the cultural norm, adding analytical depth.
- •The point about reduced labour mobility is an insightful, less commonly raised negative consequence.
- •The positive community-cohesion argument is stated but not illustrated with a concrete example.
Write your own. Get a real band read.
Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.
Attempt this question