282 words, written by us as a teaching example — not a verified exam script. Read it, then attempt the question yourself.
“Some argue history should be compulsory in school, while others say students should focus on practical subject…”Model answer
282 wordsP1Debate about which subjects deserve priority in school curricula often positions the humanities against the sciences, with history and science as representative rivals. Advocates of history argue that understanding the past is essential for informed citizenship, while science enthusiasts contend that technical literacy is what a modern economy and society genuinely require. I believe both disciplines are indispensable, but a compulsory grounding in history carries particular value.
P2The case for prioritising science and practical subjects is persuasive. Economies increasingly demand workers with strong numeracy, data literacy, and technological competence. Climate change, public health, and artificial intelligence are among the defining challenges of the age, and addressing them requires a citizenry that can evaluate scientific evidence critically. Schools that neglect science risk producing graduates poorly equipped to participate meaningfully in these conversations or to compete in knowledge-intensive job markets.
P3Yet history offers something that science curricula rarely replicate: an understanding of how power operates, how societies repeat patterns of error, and how context shapes every human decision. Students who study the build-up to the First World War, the mechanics of colonial economics, or the psychology of mass political movements develop a form of critical perspective that is genuinely difficult to acquire elsewhere. Democracies function better when citizens understand precedent, propaganda, and the slow processes by which rights are won and lost.
Write your answer in the exam workspace and see how your four marks compare to the model’s.
P4Furthermore, a narrow focus on immediately vocational subjects risks producing technically capable but historically unrooted graduates susceptible to ideological manipulation and short-termist thinking.
P5In conclusion, while science education is vital, the case for compulsory history is compelling on civic rather than merely academic grounds. Ideally, school systems should require both, recognising that scientific competence and historical understanding are complementary rather than competing.