Band 8 model answer
A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.
“Some say governments should fund the arts; others think public money should be spent on more essential services. Discuss both views and give your opinion.”8
Overall
8
Task response
8
Coherence & cohesion
8
Lexical resource
8
Grammar
Whether taxpayers' money should be directed towards arts funding or allocated entirely to essential public services is a debate that recurs with particular force during periods of financial constraint. Both positions carry real weight, though I believe selective government support for the arts remains justified.
Those who question public arts funding argue that health, education, housing, and infrastructure represent far more pressing claims on limited government budgets. When hospitals are understaffed or schools lack basic resources, subsidising opera houses or contemporary art galleries can seem an extravagance that primarily benefits educated, affluent audiences rather than the general population. From this perspective, arts funding reflects misaligned priorities in which cultural prestige is purchased at the expense of genuine public welfare.
The counter-argument, however, is compelling. The arts generate economic returns through cultural tourism, creative industries, and urban regeneration that often dwarf the initial public investment. Cities such as Bilbao, transformed partly through the construction of the Guggenheim Museum, demonstrate how strategic arts investment attracts visitors and stimulates local economies. Beyond economics, publicly funded arts preserve national heritage, support community identity, and provide accessible cultural experiences for citizens who could not afford market-rate tickets. Many of the world's greatest museums and galleries depend on state subsidy to remain open to all.
Critically, the choice between arts and essential services is frequently a false dichotomy. A well-managed public budget can sustain both, particularly if arts funding is tied to accessibility requirements and community benefit criteria.
In conclusion, while essential services must remain the priority, entirely abandoning arts funding would impoverish national culture and forfeit significant economic benefits. Targeted, accountable arts investment is a legitimate and worthwhile use of public money.
- •The Bilbao example is concrete and well-integrated, illustrating the economic argument effectively.
- •The 'false dichotomy' point in the penultimate paragraph is a sophisticated move that elevates the analysis.
- •Clear, consistent personal opinion that is appropriately qualified rather than dogmatic.
- •The argument that arts audiences are primarily affluent is stated but not fully interrogated, a brief counterpoint would strengthen balance.
Write your own. Get a real band read.
Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.
Attempt this question