📝 Model answerBand 8285 words

Band 8 model answer

A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.

Some say globalisation has destroyed traditional cultures, others say it has enriched them. Discuss both and give your view.

8

Overall

8

Task response

8

Coherence & cohesion

8

Lexical resource

8

Grammar

Globalisation has reshaped virtually every society on the planet, raising urgent questions about the fate of local traditions, languages, and customs. Critics argue that the spread of dominant cultures, particularly Western consumer culture, has eroded irreplaceable heritage, while supporters contend that cross-cultural contact has breathed new life into traditions that might otherwise have stagnated. I believe both phenomena occur simultaneously, though the net effect is ultimately enriching.

The case for cultural destruction is not difficult to make. Dominant global media, multinational fast-food brands, and the ubiquity of English have combined to homogenise daily life in ways that were unimaginable a generation ago. Indigenous languages are disappearing at an alarming rate, with linguists estimating that a significant proportion of the world's languages may vanish within this century as younger generations shift to more economically powerful tongues. Traditional crafts, ceremonies, and culinary practices are similarly threatened when communities abandon them in favour of more commercially visible alternatives.

Yet globalisation has also offered traditional cultures unprecedented platforms and audiences. Japanese anime, Korean pop music, Peruvian cuisine, and Indian yoga have all achieved genuinely global followings, in part because digital connectivity allows niche cultural products to find devoted audiences worldwide. Many communities have revitalised dormant traditions precisely because external interest has made them economically and culturally valuable. Cultural exchange, moreover, has historically always produced hybrid forms, from jazz to fusion cooking, that are creative achievements in their own right.

The challenge is ensuring that exchange remains genuinely reciprocal rather than one-directional and commercially driven.

In conclusion, globalisation both threatens and enriches traditional cultures. With appropriate policies protecting linguistic diversity and heritage industries, the enrichment can outweigh the losses, making cultural globalisation a broadly positive phenomenon.

✅ What carries it
  • Exceptionally balanced: both sides receive substantive, specific examples from multiple world regions.
  • The concept of hybridity, jazz, fusion cuisine, adds intellectual depth beyond a simple preservation-versus-loss framing.
  • Precise and varied vocabulary: 'homogenise', 'dormant traditions', 'reciprocal', 'hybrid forms'.
  • The conditional conclusion ('with appropriate policies') is sophisticated and avoids oversimplification.
⚠️ What keeps it from higher
  • The paragraph on cultural destruction focuses heavily on language; broadening to one more dimension (e.g., religion or architecture) would add texture.
⚡ Your turn

Write your own. Get a real band read.

Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.

Attempt this question