📝 Model answerBand 8286 words

Band 8 model answer

A model answer written to illustrate a Band 8 response to this question, with the rubric breakdown and what carries it. Written by us as a teaching example, not a verified exam script.

Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

8

Overall

8

Task response

8

Coherence & cohesion

8

Lexical resource

8

Grammar

The sight of children absorbed in smartphones for extended periods is now commonplace across much of the world. Understanding why this pattern has emerged, and reaching a considered verdict on its implications, are both important tasks for parents, educators and policy makers.

Multiple factors explain children's intensive smartphone use. Social media platforms and messaging applications are engineered to maximise engagement through intermittent reward mechanisms, notifications, likes and streamed content, that make disengagement psychologically difficult even for adults, let alone developing minds. For many children, the smartphone has also become the primary site of peer socialisation; staying connected to class groups, gaming communities and friendship networks online feels socially necessary rather than optional. Reduced opportunities for unsupervised outdoor play, a consequence of urbanisation and parental anxiety about safety, have simultaneously diminished the alternatives.

Whether this constitutes a positive or negative development depends partly on how smartphones are used. Access to educational resources, global communication and creative tools represents genuine opportunity, and young people who develop digital literacy early may be better equipped for an economy in which such skills are increasingly valued.

Nevertheless, the weight of evidence points to net negative effects when use is unmanaged and excessive. Longitudinal research consistently associates heavy smartphone use in childhood with disrupted sleep, reduced attention span, heightened anxiety and diminished face-to-face social competence. The displacement of physical activity by screen time also contributes to the broader rise in childhood obesity and sedentary-related health conditions. For younger children especially, the developmental costs of passive consumption appear to outweigh the benefits.

On balance, extended daily smartphone use by children is a negative development that demands regulatory attention, parental guidance and redesigned digital environments that prioritise wellbeing over engagement.

✅ What carries it
  • Explains the psychological engineering behind addictive design ('intermittent reward mechanisms') with analytical precision.
  • Acknowledges the genuine benefits of digital access before making a clear, evidence-grounded negative judgement.
  • Closing sentence is decisive and identifies three distinct levels of response.
  • Precise vocabulary throughout: 'longitudinal research', 'passive consumption', 'digital literacy'.
⚠️ What keeps it from higher
  • The positive case in the middle paragraph could be supported with a concrete example to avoid seeming like a token concession.
⚡ Your turn

Write your own. Get a real band read.

Reading a model answer only takes you so far. Write your own response to this question and we’ll grade it against the four official rubrics, the same way we scored this one.

Attempt this question